Supreme Court Closes Case Against Isha Foundation Over Alleged Illegal Confinement, Women Testify Voluntary Stay

On October 18, 2024, the Supreme Court of India officially closed proceedings related to a habeas corpus petition that accused spiritual leader Jaggi Vasudev’s Isha Foundation of illegally confining two women at its ashram in Coimbatore. The bench, led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, made the decision after both women testified that they were residing at the ashram voluntarily and without any coercion.

The habeas corpus petition, which allows courts to demand the presence of an individual held under alleged unlawful detention, was initially filed by the father of the two women. He claimed that his daughters, aged 39 and 42, were being detained against their will at the Isha Foundation. However, the women refuted these claims, asserting their free will in staying at the foundation’s ashram.

Police Report and Court Proceedings

In accordance with the Supreme Court’s directive on October 3, the Tamil Nadu Police submitted a status report regarding the investigation into the alleged illegal confinement. The police report did not find any substantial evidence to support the allegations. As a result, the apex court decided to halt further proceedings.

The case initially reached the Supreme Court after the Isha Foundation filed a petition challenging the Madras High Court’s order that directed the Coimbatore Police to gather details of cases involving the foundation. The Supreme Court, while closing the case, emphasized that these types of proceedings should not be used to malign individuals or organizations.

Women’s Statements

During the Supreme Court hearing, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Isha Foundation, informed the court that the two women had joined the ashram willingly many years ago, at the ages of 24 and 27. Rohatgi further stated that they had been active participants in the foundation’s events, including a 10 km marathon, and were in regular contact with their family members.

Chief Justice Chandrachud, following a virtual meeting with the women, confirmed that their testimonies clearly demonstrated their voluntary stay at the Isha Foundation. “We have spoken to both individuals, who have clearly expressed their voluntary stay at the Isha Foundation. Once that is established, no further direction is needed in this habeas corpus case,” said Chandrachud.

Criticism of Police Inquiry and Madras High Court’s Role

The Supreme Court criticized the Madras High Court for ordering a police investigation into the allegations despite the women’s consistent statements affirming their voluntary stay. Chief Justice Chandrachud remarked, “These proceedings cannot be to malign people and malign institutions.” He underscored that the case should have been dismissed earlier and that the court’s time was being unnecessarily consumed.

The police inquiry, which was initiated on the High Court’s direction, raised concerns regarding Isha Foundation’s activities. The Tamil Nadu Police informed the court about six missing person cases associated with the foundation over the past 15 years, five of which had been resolved. One case, however, remains under investigation.

Supreme Court’s Final Remarks

The Supreme Court concluded the case by clarifying that its decision solely pertained to the habeas corpus petition and not to any ongoing investigations by state authorities. The bench made it clear that the Tamil Nadu Police could continue their inquiries independently if needed.

Additionally, the court advised the Isha Foundation to form an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), particularly in cases involving women and minors. Chief Justice Chandrachud suggested that the foundation comply with legal requirements to avoid future conflicts. He further instructed the Tamil Nadu authorities to ensure the foundation adheres to these guidelines.

Broader Implications

The closure of this case serves as a reminder of the significance of due process and evidence-based legal proceedings in India. It also highlights the role that spiritual and religious organizations, such as the Isha Foundation, play in the lives of individuals, which can sometimes lead to family disputes and legal challenges.

While the Supreme Court’s decision has brought this particular case to a close, the Tamil Nadu Police may continue to monitor the foundation’s activities, especially in relation to the missing persons cases that have drawn public attention.

Public Reactions and Commentary

Public opinion surrounding this case remains divided. Supporters of Isha Foundation and its leader, Jaggi Vasudev, view the Supreme Court’s ruling as a vindication, arguing that the allegations were part of an effort to discredit the spiritual leader and his organization. On the other hand, critics maintain that the organization needs more stringent oversight, especially given the historical missing person cases linked to it.

The Supreme Court’s decision has brought relief to the Isha Foundation, which has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing. However, this case has reignited the debate over the need for increased transparency and regulation of spiritual organizations in India.